The Long-Term Cost of Investing in the Wrong Index Fund

Share with a quick click!

Not all index funds are created equally. While they may follow similar indices in a similar manner, the costs involved can vary greatly.

Fidelity FIRE

If you’ve invested in a simple three-fund portfolio or a variation with a quality, low-cost firm, you’ve probably got costs of well under a tenth of a percent. Would you believe there are companies chargin more than 1% per year for an S&P 500 fund?

It’s true, and you can find them from big names like Wells Fargo (WFINX), BlackRock (BSPZX), and J.P. Morgan Chase (OEICX). Even worse is the Rydex S&P 500 fund (RYSYX) with an expense ratio of 2.33%.

Those costs are absurd, and they can do serious damage to your portfolio. I’ve said it before, and our friend at Just Start Investing is about to say it again in today’s guest post. If you’re not careful, Investing Fees Will Cost You Millions.

 

About the Author: Just Start Investing is a personal finance website that makes investing easy. Learn the simple strategies to start investing today, as well as ways to optimize your credit cards, banking and budget.

 

JSI

The Long-Term Cost of Investing in the Wrong Index Fund

 

Your index fund might be costing you millions of dollars.

That’s right, it’s literally costing you. Index investing is a great strategy, but not all index funds are created equal. Some charge significantly more than others for their services.

If deciding to invest in index funds is a great first step, minimizing your index fund fees is the necessary second step.

 

CurizonBannerAD1 250

Start receiving paid survey opportunities in your area of expertise to your email inbox by joining the Curizon community of Physicians and Healthcare Professionals.

Use our link to Join and you'll also be entered into a drawing for an additional $250 to be awarded to one new registrant referred by Physician on FIRE this month.

Quick, What’s an Index Fund?

 

Index funds have been around awhile, and most of you by now are likely familiar with them. Though, with the rise of ETFs and with indexes before more niche, it’s worth a quick refresher on what an index fund is and its intended purpose.

An index fund is a mutual fund that is designed to mirror an established index (like the S&P 500). It’s the opposite of an actively managed mutual fund that hires a fund manager to pick stocks to invest in.

The index fund was originally created by John Bogle for every day investors to be able to mirror the overall stock market. That is still the best use for index funds today.

It’s easy to get distracted by flashy ETFs and mutual funds that mirror niche markets or offer free trades. But the best strategy is to stay disciplined and stay investing in broad index funds for the long term.

 

The Millionaire Dollar Mistake When Picking an Index Fund

 

So, with that said, the most important factor to look at when picking an index fund is its expense ratio.

Simple stated, an expense ratio is the percentage of your investment that is used to pay the fund every year. It’s your cost.

This expense is often overlooked, but it shouldn’t be. It can cost you millions of dollars over the long term.

 

RYSYX
the s&p500 vs. rydex s&p500

 

Why Expense Ratios Can Cost So Much

 

Expense ratios vary from 0% (thanks to new Fidelity funds) all the way to 1% or higher. For many actively managed funds, it can even be 2% or more.

Thankfully, most established index funds and ETFs offer fees more in the range of 0.02%-0.15% (thanks to Charles Schwab and Vanguard).

Sure, it’s clear that the difference between a 0.02% fund and 1.00% fund can be huge (all else equal). Actually, for an investor with a large nest egg of $1,000,000, it can cost you over $4,000,000 over a 40 year span!

 

 

For most, that’s easy to understand. It’s essentially a full percentage point difference in return, which is going to compound to some big differences over time.

What’s less known, is that the difference between the 0.02% fund and 0.15% fund can still be huge!

In the same scenario, an investor who starts with $1,000,000 and invests over 40 years in the 0.15% fund will have $643,449 in higher costs than the 0.02% fund.

 

JSI_Expense_Ratio_2

 

Now let’s say that investor is constantly saving and invests an additional $25,000 every year on top of the $1,000,000 they started with. Now the cost difference between the two funds is $790,645!

 

Over a quarter of a million dollars.

 

pearson 250web

 

JSI_Expense_Ratio_3

 

But what if you earn slightly less and are starting with a smaller nest egg? Do these costs still apply?

Yes, just with proportionally smaller numbers.

Someone with $100,000 now who is investing $10,000 a year will have $123,223 in added costs (0.15% compared to a 0.02% fund).

 

 

Yes, the lines on the chart appear close together, but $100,000 is a lot of money no matter who you are. Don’t let it slip away!

 

A Couple Of Caveats

 

There are a couple of assumptions I want to make clear on the above examples.

For one, this is assuming that all funds are created equal. Obviously, in reality, they are not.

Most index funds matching the Dow Jones or S&P 500 can be assumed to have similar returns, so when comparing funds within that category the expense ratio is a huge factor to consider.

Though, if you are considering international funds or small cap funds that have a slightly higher expense ratio, you need to take into account if that expense ratio is worth the diversification or higher expected returns from these funds.

If your small cap fund has a 0.50% expense ratio and only beats the S&P 500 by 0.25%, it likely was not worth the purchase. You could have gotten an S&P 500 fund for 0.05% (or less) and netted out 0.20% ahead.

That 0.20% can add up quick year after year.

To help give you a quick view of how much an expense ratio is really costing you, I created the table below. It lays out what 0.01% can cost every year depending on how large your investment is.

 

JSI_Expense_Ratio_5

 

You can quickly see based on your nest egg how much just a 0.01% increase in expense ratio can cost you over time.

Note: this assumes 7% annual growth of your investment.

 

  MD728

MDforLives. Find the latest medical articles and paid surveys. Earn honoraria up to $500 per survey. Join now!

Other Things to Consider when Buying Index Funds

 

The expense ratio is arguably the most important thing to examine when buying an index fund. Though, there are a couple other things to keep an eye on as well.

 

Additional Fees:

 

Other fees have the ability to cost you a ton of money, just like an expense ratio. Some common ones to minimize are:

 

  • Load Fees: Load fees are sales commissions that are sometimes charged to you when you buy or sell a fund.
  • Transaction Costs: Transaction costs is what a broker charges you to make a trade. Vanguard and Charles Schwab charge $0 when trading their own funds.
  • Spreads: Spreads apply to ETFs, which trade like stocks. There is a bid and asking price with the middle man taking the difference.
  • 12b-1 Fees: This is a fee sometimes charged to cover administrative costs. Sounds like an expense ratio dressed up in a different name to me.

 

 

Dividend Yield and Past Capital Gains Distributions:

 

If you are looking to create income with dividends (or avoid them for tax purposes) it’s good to examine what past yields and capital gains distributions have been.

Looking at portfolio turnover can help clue you in to what the capital gains distributions may be in the future.

 

Types of Index to Mirror:

 

This is an obvious one, but make sure you are mirroring an established index.

Buying a biotech ETF is not index investing. It’s a mix of index investing and stock picking (gambling). If you want to be in that game, fine.

Otherwise, make sure you are mirroring established indexes (like the S&P 500 or Dow Jones) or indexes that provide diversification (Small Cap Stocks, International Stocks, Bonds, REITs, etc.).

 

Where You’re Buying your Index:

 

Last but not least, make sure you are buying your indexes (and all investment vehicles) at a quality broker.

Good means low fees and wide variety. Charles Schwab and Vanguard offer a large variety of funds at rock bottom prices. There are many other great picks similar to those two, as well.

Other brokers charge you every time you trade and may not offer funds with low expense. As we just walked through, expenses can cost you way more than you think.

 

[PoF: I could have used this post when I started investing in a SEP IRA nearly 13 years ago. Today, I’d choose an individual 401(k) rather than a SEP IRA, but that wasn’t my biggest sin.

I chose funds rather haphazardly, and the collection included an S&P 500 fund with an ER of 0.38%. I could have done worse, but I could have done a lot better!

Thank you to Just Start Investing for sharing the numbers and carts with us today. Better late than never!]

 

WCI Courses July sale 400 Sale price & BOGO offer ending this Monday 6/13.

 

Do you know the expense ratio of the funds you’re invested in? Did you realize that excessive fees can indeed cost you millions?

8 thoughts on “The Long-Term Cost of Investing in the Wrong Index Fund”

  1. This is one of my favorite Million Dollar Decisions. I can’t think of another easy to learn piece of information that is worth so much money. Literally reading this post is the extent of what someone not knowing anything about expense ratios would need to know to be a million dollars richer!

    Reply
  2. Subscribe to get more great content like this, an awesome spreadsheet, and more!
  3. I don’t know about investing right now. Seems the Fed and other central banks have no exit plan from a decade of ultra loose policy. Even Kudlow said yesterday rates will never rise in his lifetime. Is he going to die soon? Or are we trapped? I mean, the friggin pension plans are underfunded even with a decade bull market. What’s going to happen if the markets only tread with all the distribution ahead? Will the Fed have to monetize stocks so we don’t have a yellow vest movement here?

    Reply
    • I don’t think anyone knows if investing right now is a good idea, or bad. The markets could dip tomorrow, or they could rise for another 1, 5 or 10 years.

      Since I’ve got a long ways to go before I need to pull any money out of the market, I’m not speculating as I don’t want to miss out on another 10 year run. And I can also afford to wait out a short term dip.

      Reply
      • But what if the last 40 years have been one big credit bubble and the next 40 will be the other side as it contracts?

        Blindly investing in an index fund could be the worst thing to do as it’s tantamount to extrapolating past performance. Lokk about you. Passive investing is the zeitgeist. Everybody is doing it. You know what that means. The majority is always wrong.

        Reply
        • True dat. but look at the stock market overal graph since inception…upwards….as long as you have time on your hands(10yrs shoulde be fine as most downturns dont seem to last past 2-3yrs)..you should be net postitive….another way to think about it…what else are you going to do with your money that does not take any mental/physical effort…invest man.

  4. Low expense ratios are great. I have a VTSAX through Vanguard at 0.04%. Historically this has been an amazing index fund to invest in. How does this compare to Fidelity’s new total stock market index funds with 0.015% and a 0.00% expense ratio? Is it worth it? Is everything else equal?

    Reply

Leave a Comment

shares