Why This Index Fund Investor Purchased an Individual Stock

I hopped out of the shower and into my Fruit of the Looms. After a quick electric shave, powered by Duracell, I put on my favorite Original Penguin shirt from Munsingwear and a pair of jeans and strapped on my Tony Lama boots. I looked pretty sharp. Not as cute as my son in his Garanimals or as dashing as my wife and her Helzberg Diamond ring and white gold necklace from Ben Bridge Jeweler.

After perusing the Buffalo News and enjoying a hearty brunch prepared with our Pampered Chef cookware, I headed out for an important meeting, but not before grabbing a few See’s Candies bon bons — I have a bit of a sweet tooth — and admiring the accent wall in the dining room, freshly livened up with Benjamin Moore paints.

I left with enough time to grab a Dairy Queen Blizzard before hopping aboard the Net Jets plane I had reserved. I sometimes fly coach, but when you’re meeting with the Marmon Group, a $4.5 Billion holding company, you pack an Italian suit and take a private plane.


I Made All of That Up.

Truthfully, almost none of this is true. I do have an Original Penguin shirt and a penchant for Blizzards and See’s candy, and my boys have donned Garanimals, but I made the remaining details of this story up. Why?

I own all of these businesses.

Every brand name dropped above is 99% to 100% owned by Berkshire Hathaway Inc., and I am a Berkshire shareholder. Let’s try this silly exercise again with companies partially owned by Berkshire Hathaway.


The Rest of The Story


On the way to Chicago, I opened the Coca Cola, Cracker Barrel Cheese, Planters Peanuts, and Claussen Pickles I had picked up at Wal-Mart for an unconventional but satisfying lunch. I normally shop at Costco, but I ever since they switched from American Express to VISA, I don’t go there as much.

I was picked up in a Cadillac and I directed the chauffer to swing by a Wells Fargo branch so I could withdraw some cash for a brewery tour — I wasn’t sure they would take my Mastercard. We proceeded to grab some Burger King, conveniently located next to the Phillips 66 station, and made our way to the Loop.

Before the meeting, I pulled out my Apple iPhone (shipped by UPS, on Verizon service) and paid our Charter bill online. After hours of intense negotiation, or whatever it is that business people do at business meetings, I enjoyed a few tasty beverages before turning in early to ensure I could catch my American Airlines flight home the next day.



Answer quick MicroSurveys for cash. Designed with convenience and timeliness in mind, 70% of surveys are answered on a mobile device in just a few minutes.

Physicians, Pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals are invited to join Incrowd today!


Berkshire Hathaway Owns Many Companies.


I could write paragraph after nonsensical paragraph like those above, but I think the point has been made. Owning shares of Berkshire Hathaway is a bit like owning a mutual fund. It is a basket of individual companies. For a complete list, see Wikipedia’s list of assets owned.

Berkshire Hathaway also keeps a list of links to subsidiary companies on its website (prepare to be awed by the 1990s coding technology!) but ignores corporations with minor holdings.

You’ll also find links to Warren Buffett’s and Charlie Munger’s letters to shareholders, annual reports, and more on the barebones homepage.



The Performance of Berkshire Hathaway


Berkshire Hathaway, which was a New England textile company when Buffett started buying shares in the early 1960s, had its heyday before the turn of the century. There’s a reason Omaha ranks among the U.S. cities with the most millionaires per capita. From 1965 to 2006, the stock returned an average of 21%, doubling roughly every 3.5 years based on the Rule of 72.

Since I made my purchase in August of 2016, the stock has performed reasonably well, beating the S&P 500 and performing similarly to an aggregate of US stocks. According to Empower and consistent with the current value of my holdings, I’ve seen a 113% increase in my Berkshire holdings as of February, 2022.





Of course, past performance does not predict future results. And the men responsible for these returns are no spring chickens. Some investors or would-be investors are concerned that the value of the stock will drop when the stalwarts Charlie Munger and Warren Buffett pass away, but Buffett has gone on record to say he predicts the stock price will increase the day after the inevitable happens.


Berkshire Hathaway Pays No Dividend


For some investors, this would be considered a turnoff. For a high-income professional, however, the lack of a dividend is something to celebrate!

It’s commonly known that qualified dividends are taxed at a rate of 15%. If you’re in a low tax bracket (the 15% federal income tax bracket = ~ $75,000 of taxable income for a couple), qualified dividends are tax-free. I hope to take advantage of this fact in retirement.

However, for the high-income professional with a taxable investment account, dividends are an enemy to your total return.

Sure, there’s the aforementioned 15% tax on qualified dividends. In most states, you can add on state income tax of about 4% to 10% or more. Some cities impose an income tax on dividends, too.


If you enjoy the household income of many physicians, you’ll be subject to the 3.8% NIIT (ACA) tax. And it you’re in the top federal income tax bracket, tack on another 5%. It’s not uncommon to give up 25% to 35% or more of your qualified dividend payments to taxes.

In the case of ordinary dividends, the tax treatment is even worse — you’ll be taxed at your marginal tax rate, which for many of us can exceed 40% or even 50%.

Berkshire Hathaway has famously paid no dividend, meaning you will pay no taxes along the way simply for owning the stock in a taxable brokerage account. While there are tax managed funds, their tax efficiency pales in comparison to Berkshire Hathaway.

Eventually, if you have a gain in the stock, as I hope and expect to do, you may owe some capital gains taxes. But if you wait until retirement to cash out, you may very well find yourself in a lower tax bracket, possibly in the bracket in which you can avoid federal taxes on long term capital gains entirely.

There’s another reason I purchased this strong performing, no-dividend paying individual stock. The Berkshire Hathaway Annual Shareholders Meeting.


Woodstock for Capitalists


Every spring, the wealthy, the wannabe wealthy, investment gurus, and money geek bloggers like me descend upon Omaha, Nebraska to partake in the spectacle sometimes referred to as “Woodstock for Capitalists.”

I have not yet made the trip — work, travel plans, and a pandemic have interfered — but I would like to attend the extravaganza soon. At ages 98 and 91, one never knows how many more opportunities we’ll have to see Charlie Munger and Warren Buffett speak and sip Cherry Coke in person.

In addition to seeing the legends in person, the meeting would also present an excellent opportunity to network with other investors, bloggers, and authors who make the trip from around the country and globe. And besides, I’ve never found another reason to visit Omaha. I’ve heard they’ve got a nice zoo.



Do you purchase individual stocks? Are you a Berkshire Hathaway owner? Any plans to attend Warren-palooza 2018 or have you attended in the past?


Share this post:

85 thoughts on “Why This Index Fund Investor Purchased an Individual Stock”

  1. Subscribe to get more great content like this, an awesome spreadsheet, and more!
  2. Learn how to better manage your student loan debt, and explore refinancing to a lower rate with cash back offers up to $1,000! Student Loan Resource Page
  3. A lot of this approach is quite emotionally-driven (especially in comments about nostalgia, shareholder meeting festivities, personality cult, etc)… Huge red flag for me. I don’t know why so many people in the DIY investment world (FIRE, WCI, even Dave Ramsey) think the rules don’t apply to them and likewise own individual Berkshire Hathaway, Amazon, or Tesla stock.
    …I guess I’ll stay boring with my indexing!

    • I think of BRK as a small index fund. They own a bunch of different companies, obviously.

      The main point of the article is the fact that it’s extremely tax-efficient. No dividend = no forced taxation. You decide when and how you take your returns.

      But you’re free to invest in nothing but index funds, as I do with the vast majority of my portfolio. There are no called strikes in this game.


  4. If you wanted one more reason to purchase Berkshire Hathaway, I hear you can get a discount on Geico car insurance (8% off). I haven’t tried this but there’s a number of references to it (even though details are slim on their website).

  5. My kids are adopted orphans from China.

    I put $20K of BRK.B in a UTMA for each of my kids on their adoption day. It throws off no taxes, and grows like a weed. I never told them about it even after they turned 18. The problem with a UTMA is at 18 they “take possession” and can just go blow the money on a ‘Vet or something. My daughters have been living off the proceeds (not college expenses per se’ but things like food, travel, computers, iPhones, summer abroad etc) unbeknownst to them while in college ever since. It gives an extra $5-10K per year spending money for experiences. Once they finish college there will be money for a new car and a nice start in life. If I wanted I could just leave it in there, not tell them until they are 50 and they would have a retirement.

    I also own it in my taxable accounts.

    Yea Warren and Charlie

    • That was a smart move. I’ve been funding 529 Plans for our boys, but haven’t opted for the UTMA — mainly for the reason you mention. I don’t want them to learn to spend big before they’ve earned some money of their own.


  6. Hi PoF,

    Regarding the performance of BRK.

    Does BRK.B enjoy the identical rate of returns as BRK.A? I’m considering buying BRK.B, but was wondering if my yearly growth would be the same as shareholders of BRK.A

    Thank you!

  7. Great intro, as I read it I started recognizing the names (it became obvious at Helzberg, See’s and then Net Jets)… WB’s shareholder letters are great fun reads (the beginning when we talks about the businesses, less fun as you get into the numbers and tables). I learned about the existence of reinsurance because of those letters.

    I am a proud owner of BRK.B and thought about going to Omaha but there are never any hotel rooms (or they’re absurd). It seems like a cool thing to go to but the logistics seem to be a nightmare too.

  8. Back when I was making less than $50k a year, and BRK-B came out, I bought as many as I could afford: 7 shares.

    I didn’t know anything about stock picking or have an investment strategy to speak of. I just knew that every dollar I could scrape together would be well spent buying Berkshire Hathaway and darn if I don’t regret not buying more! The stock is up about 140% now 🙂

    For sentimental reasons, I haven’t sold it. And who knows, maybe one day soon I’ll be able to make time for the Omaha meeting.

  9. I bought BRK this spring only because I wanted to attend the meeting before we lose Warren. I went for Warren but came away loving Charlie.

    It was well worth going–yay capitalism! Make a plan to go soon!

  10. This was a good post. I always read from personal finance bloggers how they only buy index funds. I think that is bad advice. You saw a return of 6.8% over the S&P. That is almost the same as the yearly S&P average return! Buying good quality stocks like Berkshire over the long term is always better than buying an Index Fund. An Index Fund lowers your risks and your returns. Buffett didn’t get rich from buying Index Funds!!!

  11. I concur with Dividend Growth Investor — a dividend within the next few years seems highly likely. From an interview with Morningstar’s Berkshire Hathaway analyst:

    DH: At the meeting, Buffett said he didn’t want to be sitting here three years from now with $150 billion. So do you think he’s opening the door for his successors, or do you think if Buffett is still in place in a couple of years and the cash continues to rise …

    GW: I think he’ll make the decision and I think the threshold is less than $150 billion, it’s probably in the $120 billion range. And I believe any dividend will probably be more of the special, one-time, nature, as opposed to an ongoing quarterly dividend. At this point, Berkshire could easily pay out $5 billion a year as a regular dividend. But I think the bigger advantage for Berkshire is to leave that option for the next guys, allowing them to say, “listen, we want you to be on the ride with us, come along and see how we can do with this business, and—by the way—we’re going to give you a one and one half percent yield.”

  12. As you may know I own individual stocks. I own index funds. I own real estate.

    By the way, you also own individual stocks. The funds you own selected the stocks using some indexing criteria. I select the stocks myself using my indexing criteria.

    You may be surprised by this statement, but I also own BRK.B. I think that they will initiate a dividend in a few years or so.. Without Warren and Charlie ( who are rapidly depreciating), I do not have a high degree of confidence in the future.. On a go forward basis, I am not sure if your VTI would not do as well as BRK.B..

    • Based on your description of the problem, I think that index funds are the enemy of the high-income professional. By indexing, you are stuck with companies that pay you the dividends that you say cost you so much of your total return. You may think that you do not like dividends, but what is really causing you anxiety are those index funds that distribute so much to you. I mean, some index funds also distribute capital gains to shareholders – that must hurt the taxable index investor in the high-income tax brackets.

      I think you should sell your index funds, and buy non dividend paying stocks with the proceeds. You seem like the perfect candidate to create your own index fund.

      You will get the tax efficiency you desire, and have better control over the investment selection process and portfolio turnover.

      • The higher the dividend, the worse it is for me to hold in taxable. Of course, that’s not the only factor to consider, but if there were such a thing as an S&P 500 fund that gave me the same total return without dispersing any dividends or capital gains, I’d be all about it.

        WCI recently reviewed the Vanguard “tax managed” funds that attempt to reduce yield. Their returns are similar to the non-tax managed funds, but they have higher expense ratios. Still, they may very well give superior after-fee, after-tax returns when held in a taxable account. Growth funds will also tend to hold more stocks with low or no dividend yield.

        A disadvantage of avoiding the indexes and sticking with tax managed funds is how difficult it is to tax loss harvest without changing your asset allocation and losing the advantages of the tax managed funds.

        A basket of stocks might be another approach worth considering if starting from scratch. I know you say you think I should sell all my funds, and I’m sure you say it in jest, because we both know that realizing hundreds of thousands in capital gains would be the dumbest thing I could possibly do at this point. The goal is to optimize, and the would be extremely suboptimal.


  13. I remember reading about Berkshire Hathaway in The Little Book that Beats the Market. And in it, the story of the woman who made a fortune buying A shares. Who knows what’ll happen when these guys kick it? Of course, I know a lady who just turned 109. It’s possible they’ll be around longer than we think. I hope so. I feel like the world’s a better place with Warren Buffett in it.

  14. POF,

    I’ve been reading your blog for about a year and WCI for way longer. We not only share the same specialty, but also the exact same reasons why I decided to buy Berkshire. I’ve owned my shares for about 6 months longer than you and I am happy to hold for the long haul, although I do have some fears of what would happen when one of them dies. Also looking to trek to Omaha at some point. Keep up the good writing!

  15. Hmm I find it hard to believe BH will go up right after Mr. Buffett passes. He is a certainly talented business man and investor, I’m not sure if anyone can repeat what he has done! Haha @ Woodstock for PF nerds, I watched his documentary and I thought wow, this guy’s a rockstar!

    • His explanation was there may be speculation of brekaup / spinoffs in the immediate days following his departure.

      That doesn’t say anything about the long-term health of the company, but they already have capable working alongside them. It will be interesting to see what happens over the years and decades to come.


  16. I’ll start by saying I like Berkshire. Buffet has done a good job of leveraging his positions to get better deals in his favor, preferred shares of bank of America anyone, and ensure management follows the right path. But.. I’ll also point out that being large conglomerate secures nothing. Exhibit A GE which currently seems to be circling the drain. Also there’s no telling what happens when buffet is no longer in power. How many of those deals hinge on his name for example. Ultimately I like Berkshire as they do a good job of instilling good management in companies they buy, but there is no magic bullet so I still don’t own them as a standalone stock.

    • Those who have believed in them over the decades have done very, very well, but that doesn’t mean the glory days will continue.

      For me, it’s worth holding a small amount for the annual meeting tickets if nothing else. The fact that it has appreciated over 20% in 13 months is a nice bonus, though.


  17. “Berkshire Hathaway’s historical performance is legendary. What if I had started investing in the company when I finished medical school in 2002? I would have nearly tripled my money, whereas the S&P 500 returned 151.4%. I question the accuracy of the index data here, however, with DQYDJ’s S&P 500 calculator with dividends reinvested showing a 261% return over a similar timeframe.”

    Just a minor point of clarification: If you had nearly tripled your money by investing in BRK’B in 2002, your return would be nearly 200% (not 300%). [Remember, if you double your money, your return is 100%….triple is 200%, etc.] Therefore, if you would have “nearly tripled your money” in Berkshire, you would have LOST to the S&P over that time period since it’s return with dividends was 261%.

    P.S. If the S&P index return during that period was listed/calculated to be 151.4%, then it was probably just the gross index numerical return which would not include dividends…but I’m just guessing.


  18. I almost bought Brk.b, but then realized one of my ETFs also holds it so I decided against it. I still might. I do hold a basket of individual stocks along with my ETF holdings. Up until this point, it certainly wouldn’t be one of my worst picks.

    Too bad ETF holders can’t be counted as direct share holders and get to go. :O)

  19. I just bough all of the items you mentioned above, so your stock is about to sky rocket. The Blizzard Maker is a must have for sure!

    Hope you make it to the annual meeting soon. I am holding off on individual stocks until I am debt free (well maybe not mortgage free). It is a slow but steady climb.

  20. I agree that based on the tax implications of dividends, it is far more beneficial to have a company “buy back” their own stock rather than distribute and equivalent amount to their shareholders.

    Though, that doesn’t stop me from owning a few companies that do pay dividends. Plus, eventually my, “I’m a part owner of Disney, you’re really going to charge me to visit my own park?” will work eventually at the entrance, right?

  21. Makes a huge amount of sense from a high earner tax perspective I agree.

    I just can’t get over the idiosyncratic risk of a single stock. I get that it’s a diversified portfolio under the hood but no company is immune to fraud, accounting error, incompetence, regulatory scrutiny, class action suits etc.
    So I will continue to explicitly diversify in commingled funds.

    But enjoyable post – thanks!

  22. I hold stock in my taxable account from Berkshire Hathaway. As you cleverly displayed, this individual stock is like an index fund because of all of the companies under the Berkshire Hathaway umbrella. Also, I too share your affinity for DQ Blizzards. I’m a big fan of the new royal blizzards – specifically the Brownie Peanut Butter one.

    • Although I’m not necessarily looking forward to winter, I am looking forward to the Candy Cane Oreo Blizzard coming back.

      Culver’s concrete mixers are stiff competition for the blizzard, though, and are BOGO in the afternoons at at least some locations.


  23. Love following the rise of my BRKB in Personal Capital. Always hesitate to buy more because I like the dividend paying stocks (inheirited) that are auto-reinvested. Hadn’t really considered that these are all in a taxable account and therefore my BRKB is better for me tax-wise than the others. Thanks for that perspective. May buy more. Especially if it dips for a sec with all the insurance claims after the hurricanes.

  24. Best zoo in the world. We go every year. They also have the college baseball World Series and Nebraska Cornhusker college football. That’s about it.

  25. Phil Demuth would be proud of you. Back in the day I used to love to watch PBSs Wall Street Week with Louis Rukyser (90s). It was I think the first show on personal finance and investing. I went to a “convention” in 2000 at the MGM grand attended by 11000 people. I think I was the youngest person there. I had my picture made with Louis who was in his 80s at the time. Lots of big name investing gurus spoke but none predicted the dot.com bust that was about to occur.

    • No kidding!

      You gotta love the fact that you were all standing at the edge of a cliff and nobody knew it.

      Jim Dahle (WCI) attended a Bogleheads conference and was similarly felt like he was the youngest person in the place as a thirty-something amongst others two to six decades older.


  26. So far, the only individual stock I own is from my employer ESPP, but I stopped contributing when I learned more about index investing and focused on my 401K (with Vanguard) 🙂 I still have the stock and hang onto it, which hasn’t been a bad deal in the past few years!

  27. I went in 2016 and it was one of the best trips of my lifetime. It was fun to follow Warren Buffett from place to place and we even saw him at Gothams steakhouse while we were waiting for our table (make sure you call and reserve early!). We also saw him driving into his house as we were checking it out (ok now I sound like a real creeper). The 5km run is really fun too! Of course during the AGM some people asked the same thing as AGMs in the past. We hope to go to The Daily Journal AGM in 2018 🙂

        • A share of BRK.A is selling for about $300K right now, but I bought BRK.B — 68 shares to be exact, and it’s up about 36% since my purchase in August of 2016.

          I didn’t say I bought an individual share of stock; I bought an individual stock (as opposed to an index fund).


  28. Nice post Doc. Never had the pleasure of meeting the legends in person but then never owned BRK – them not paying a dividend is one reason. I wanted to own A shares in my younger days, which would’ve cost all that I had and my first born. This stock passes my screen from time to time but haven’t pulled my mouse-trigger yet (not to be confused with Warren’s elephant gun). Clearly you’ll do well with it.

    • I had my eye on BRK.A shortly after I started my career. One share dropped down to about $70,000 at the nadir in 2009.

      That would have been a great time to pick up a share. They go for $270,000 these days — nearly quadruple! My hindsight is sharp. 🙂



Leave a Comment

Related Articles

Subscribe to Physician on FIRE

If you do not see a subscription box above, please navigate here to subscribe.

Join Thousands of Doctors on the Path to FIRE

Get exclusive tips on how to reclaim control of your time and finances.