How to Get an Infinite Return Investing in Real Estate

Real Estate investing has been the topic of discussion lately. Yesterday, Jim from Route to Retire discussed why, despite being a huge fan of real estate, he was getting out of the game -completely. Today, we’ll cover the concept of an “infinite return.”

While I love the idea of returns that go to ∞, I’m not completely sold on the idea. Be sure to read to the end for additional commentary from The White Coat Ivestor and me that was made in the comments section when this post was originally written by Dr. Peter Kim. You’ll see that we’re not at all afraid to call each other out when we don’t see eye to eye on a topic.

See how Dr. Kim makes his case for what it takes to earn infinite returns when investing in real estate and what the term means to him.

This post originally appeared on Passive Income M.D.

 

How to Get an Infinite Return Investing in Real Estate

 

How to Get an Infinite Return Investing in Real Estate

 

I’ll be honest; the first time I discovered the concept of “infinite returns,” I had a hard time wrapping my mind around it. I’m very familiar with terms like “return on investment” or “annualized returns,” and I often use these concepts when determining whether an investment is worth it or not.

But an infinite return? It sounded intriguing . . . but it also sounded like just another marketing buzzword. However, I decided to do a deeper dive into this concept, which I’ve found.

 

What is an Infinite Return?

 

The definition is quite simple. “Infinite returns” are achieved when you no longer have any money in a deal, but you are still receiving the benefits of cash flow and other returns (like when a property sells).

For example, let’s say you invest $100,000 in a passive real estate deal in return for a 10% ownership stake. Over the next few years, your initial capital is returned to you – your full $100,000 – and you still get to keep the 10% stake.

Then you continue to receive distributions and cash flow based on your stake (10%), and in the future, if the property is sold, you would get a profit based on your percentage.

When you receive your full $100,000 initial investment back, you no longer have any investment in the deal. That money can be spent or invested elsewhere. You also technically can’t lose money – everything from that point is true gains. It’s like the term “playing with house money.”

So, if Return On Investment (ROI) is calculated as:

If you received $10,000 that year in distributions but no longer have any money in the deal, you can see where this idea of an “infinite” return comes from. You receive investment income with no money tied up and no risk involved.

I’ve found that there are two common ways to achieve infinite returns, specifically in real estate. They are:

  • No-money-down purchases
  • Cash-out refinance deals.

Let’s take a look at each one of these in greater depth.

 

No-Money-Down Purchases

 

A no-money-down purchase is exactly what it sounds like – you purchase a property without a down payment. Though traditional methods would have you make a sizable down payment, I know of many physicians who have been able to purchase properties using this exact method and with great success.

You’d be hard-pressed today to find a conventional bank that is willing to finance 100% of a purchase, so you don’t need to put down a down payment. However, if you get creative enough, there are still other ways to make it happen.

For example, I know investors who have had the property’s seller agree to “carry the loan” themselves for the full purchase amount. In other words, instead of having a bank lend you the money for the investment, the seller agrees to sell the property to you. You then pay the seller monthly, just as if you were getting a loan from them.

The collateral is the property itself, and terms are created just as with a normal bank: the amount of the loan, the interest rate, and the length of the term.

If this is a rental property, the investor can receive cash flow from the property even while the seller carries the debt. This can result in an infinite return scenario where no money went into the deal initially, but you’re able to benefit from the cash flow the property provides.

Alternatively, I’ve seen physicians purchase their primary homes using a 0% down physician loan. They then sell the home after it’s appreciated and gain a profit—all of this without putting an initial downpayment.

Of course, they’re usually using the profit to put down a down payment for another home, but that profit was created with a no-money-down purchase.

Both of these situations are considered no-money-down purchases and can result in an infinite return scenario.

 

 

Cash-Out Refinance Deals

 

The other situation is a bit more interesting to me and more of a strategy I look to take advantage of whenever I look for investment properties or passive real estate opportunities.

Here is the process in brief:

  • Someone purchases a rental property.
  • Raises its value by increasing the net operating income (rehab & renovate, increase rents)
  • Then refinancing the property with the bank, pulling out their initial down payment and initial rehab cost simultaneously.
  • At this point, they own the property but have taken out their initial investment, so in essence, they have none of their own initial capital in the deal.

Let’s dive into this a bit deeper.

 

How is a Property Valued?

 

First, how is a property valued? Well, a multifamily property is valued by this simple equation:

 

 

Net Operating Income (NOI) is income minus expenses, essentially profit.

Capitalization Rate (Cap Rate) is a value used to estimate a property’s profitability that is especially useful for comparing properties. Another way to say it is that the cap rate is the expected cash on cash return of property (excluding any mortgages or debt payments).

Looking at the equation above, to increase the property’s value, savvy investors look to increase the Net Operating Income. This is accomplished by taking measures to increase the income, decrease expenses, or both wherever possible.

Taking these measures is what’s known as “forced appreciation” or “forced value creation.” It’s like taking a business and improving the operations, which then increases its value.

 

Start receiving paid survey opportunities in your area of expertise to your email inbox by joining the Curizon community of Physicians and Healthcare Professionals.

Use our link to Join and you'll also be entered into a drawing for an additional $250 to be awarded to one new registrant referred by Physician on FIRE this month.

 

Banks & Cash-Out Refinancing

 

Banks are willing to lend based on a “loan to value” percentage. So if, for example, they’re willing to lend up to 75% of the value of the property, if you increase the value of the property, the amount they’re willing to lend increases accordingly.

If you’re able to increase the property’s value, and you’re able to refinance into a larger loan, you might be able to receive cashback.

Here’s a simplified example:

Let’s say you put down $250,000 to buy a $1,000,000 building. That’s accomplished by getting a $750,000 loan from the bank. This is a 75% loan to value loan: $750,000 loan for a $1 million value building. (750,000/1,000,000)

You renovate the property (spending $125,000), improve operations, increase rent, keep expenses low, and increase the property’s value. Over four years, the property’s value has become $1.5 million, up from $1 million.

You then find a bank willing to refinance you into a 75% loan-to-value loan on that $1,500,000 value. That means the bank would be willing to give you a $1,125,000 loan ($1,500,000 x .75).

You take that $1,125,000, pay off the previous $750,000 loan leaving you with $375,000 leftover.

Well, what do you know, your initial investment was a $250,000 down payment and $125,000 in renovation costs, for a total of $375,000. You pay yourself back that entire $375,000, and voila, you now own a $1.5 million valued property with none of your own capital in the deal.

Oh, and you still receive whatever cash flow it provides monthly. This whole process is tax-free until you sell.

This is what’s known as a cash-out refinance, and at this point, you’ve essentially achieved infinite return status. Moving forward, you have no more personal money in the deal, but you have the property, the cash flow, and the equity when you sell.

 

Can You Receive Infinite Returns in Passive Real Estate Investing?

 

Absolutely. When I invest in passive real estate syndications, this is one of the strategies I try to seek out.

Instead of you doing all the work to find the property, renovate it, increase rents, manage expenses, refinance, etc., you now leverage a team of professionals to accomplish this.

After all, the main goal of all my investing is for cash flow, and I’m trying to find the right balance of leveraging my time and effort to achieve the maximal result. What better way is there to have cash flow than in a deal where you have no more of your own funds tied up in it?

 

Infinite Returns From My First Syndication Investment

 

I didn’t really know what I was doing with my first syndication deal. Luckily, it just happened to become an infinite return situation, as you’ll see below. I’ll write a fully detailed post on it in the future, but here it is in brief:

On September 12, 2014, I invested $25,000 in a syndication deal for a 1.04% stake in a 6.75 million dollar property.

On November 30, 2015, I received $13,188.36 as a distribution. The sponsors had improved operations quickly and refinanced the property, and returned some of my capital. That’s 53% of my original invested capital returned to me after 14 months, leaving me with 47% of my capital in the deal.

Every quarter I continued to receive distributions averaging $300-350. On occasion, I would receive larger distributions (around $4,000-5,000) as they could return more capital to me.

On March 31, 2018, I received a distribution that put my total cumulative distributions over my $25,000 initial investment.

At this point, it meant that I no longer had any capital invested in the deal, and everything from that point forward was pure gravy. That happened in 3.5 years.

Every quarter since, I’ve received an average of $459 per quarter, which ends up being $1,836 a year if I were to calculate a return normally, $1836 ÷ $25,000, which is 7%. Not too bad, right?

But let’s remember, I have zero investment currently in the deal. Yes, it’s 7% if I’m considering my initial investment, but technically, it’s an infinite return in cash flow since I have no more money in the deal.

Not only that, but I still own a 1.04% stake in a building that just got appraised at $13.49 million. So if that sold, I would be receiving a nice profit. However, I’m happy with the infinite return cash flow I’m currently receiving.

Oh, and here’s the kicker: it’s all been tax-free. Because of depreciation, I’ve shown a negative net rental income each year. So if anything, it’s offset any other passive income gains that I’ve received.

 

Should You Be Looking For Infinite Returns?

 

There are many ways to achieve great returns when investing, especially in real estate. As it turns out, “infinite returns” is much more than a buzzword; it’s a powerful way to maximize returns while reducing risk, which is basically the holy grail of investing.

It’s also only one strategy when investing in real estate, but it’s definitely one of the tools I seek to use when making new investments.

 

[PoF: As promised, comments on this concept from WCI and me:

Physician on FIRE:

Based on the definition, I guess any investment that doubles will give you an “infinite return” from that point after. Most of my index fund investments from 5+ years ago meet the definition, and even pay quarterly dividends.

Infinite Returns sound sexy, but to me, it’s just a doubling of your money (with continued growth / returns).

 

White Coat Investor:

This concept is kind of scammy. It’s just a feel good thing. “I’m getting an infinite return.” No, you’re not. Put the numbers into XIRR and it’ll tell you what return really is and it isn’t infinite.

The real “infinite return” could come from buying an investment property with nothing down, no closing costs, and no effort. Of course, that property is usually going to be cash flow negative and thus give you a negative infinite return!

I also disagree with your statement that you cannot lose money after you get your capital out. Imagine you invest $100K into a $400K property. A few years later, you pull $100K out of it with a refinance. Can’t lose money, right? But why couldn’t that property lose value and start having negative cash flow at that point? It absolutely could and you, as the owner, would be losing money.

It’s fun to think about being able to pull your capital out and put it to work elsewhere, but “infinite return” is just a marketing buzzword, and a scammy one at that.

The more I think about this, I think the key to it is understanding the difference between total return and cash on cash return. You can certainly get an infinite cash on cash return, especially if you only look at the return moving forward from a cash out refinance. But that’s probably not the best return to be looking at.]

 

 

I've got my 2 acres of non-leveraged, crop-producing, cashflowing farmland via AcreTrader. Get yours.

 

Does this concept seem appealing to you? Have you utilized this strategy in your investing?

 

7 thoughts on “How to Get an Infinite Return Investing in Real Estate”

  1. I think all compounding interest investments have infinite return. Just segregate what you invested from the growth and from then on the growth earns an infinite rate of return because it has none of your invested money in it?

    Reply
  2. Subscribe to get more great content like this, an awesome spreadsheet, and more!
  3. Are not risk and reward proportional in investing? Sure, there are less risky and more risky investments in the world, but still mathematically, as reward approaches infinite, so does risk!

    Once you get your principle back out of an investment, there is still risk on your principle. It is called re-investment risk. What are you going to put it in next? And, any any growth on an investment is still “your money” (that is once you sell it and convert to cash, that is), so that still has investment risk.

    I’m staying away from real estate right now (aside from REITs). The real estate market is less efficient in some places than others, so there is money to be made… but people a lot smarter than me know that too and I have no doubt they will get the infinite rewards and I’ll get stuck with the bag.

    Reply
  4. I don’t agree with the harsh stance above. It’s important to demonstrate that the way we analyze numbers with our investments are important. I think PIMD is highlighting valid options to use leverage to increase your wealth. Now this can certainly be taken too far and you can become over leveraged. That is an important disclaimer that is kind of missing.

    I also agree w POF and WCI that infinite return is sort of an artificial thing. Total return is always what should be looked at. And in the case of rental real estate, over leveraging as pii I need out can become real bad real quick if things become cash flow negative.

    Reply
    • @PPS and @PIMD I am open to being convinced I am missing something.

      Here is my reasoning:
      Real estate is amazing, leverage is powerful and can cut both ways, and honesty/disclosure/open respectful discourse is part of the WCI “brand”.

      PIMD is not an enthusiastic amateur. He is a Real Estate Professional who markets a real estate investing course with links from this website. I think PIMD uses math and accounting practices in his examples in a way that is erroneous that causes it to be deceptive.
      We would certainly call out anyone who claimed infinite returns for stocks, solar panels, permanent life insurance, etc even though all of them have potential to return your principal and then more.
      What am I getting wrong?

      Reply
  5. Thanks PoF & WCI for pointing out the fake nature of this post. But why run it?
    PIMD divides his returns artificially into an initial “return of principal” (0% or low positive return depending on debt) and a later “infinite return” instead of just reporting the actual “very good highly leveraged” return”.
    And wastes 0 electrons discussing leverage risk. #2008 #greatrecession.
    This post doesn’t match your usual content and is very one sided – even with your disclaimer. Scammy. Mathematically dishonest.

    Reply
    • Thank you for the feedback, ArmyDoc.

      I chose to run it because, unlike stock and bond returns, which are fairly straightforward, real estate returns can be reported (and marketed) in any number of ways.

      While I don’t exactly agree with this concept, I think it’s worth highlighting what it means to the person who uses the term “infinite return.” A would-be investor can then make a more informed choice rather than being “wowed” by the possibility of returns to the moon! Basically, the returns on any investment could be considered (by some) to be infinite if you’ve gotten your initial investment back and are still receiving passive income. That’s all it is.

      Peter didn’t go into detail on the risks of leverage, but that is something he addresses in other articles.

      Cheers!
      -PoF

      Reply

Leave a Comment