The PoF Portfolio

Physician Financial Services[editor’s note: content updated 11/2017. Post contains affiliate links.]

[In my best Ron Burgundy voice] “My portfolio looks good. I mean really good. Hey everyone! Come see how good my portfolio looks!

I’ve touched on the importance of investing early and often, but I haven’t given you a clue as to how I invest. It wasn’t until sometime last year that I wrote myself an Investor Policy Statement and came up with an asset allocation that felt appropriate. I made a few transactions to apply the allocation across my various accounts. This is the allocation I’ve decided upon:


  • 60% US Stocks (with a tilt to small and value)
  • 22.5% International Stocks (50 / 50 developed and emerging markets)
  • 7.5% REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust)
  • 10% Bond & Cash (mostly bond plus cash emergency fund)

Is this the perfect asset allocation?


No. The White Coat Investor has identified 150 other asset allocations that are “better than yours“, although I think mine is definitely better than some of them. The only way to know, of course, is to look back at some future date and determine which portfolio performed the best. We could look in the rearview mirror and backtest a bunch of portfolios, but as we all know, past performance does not predict future results.

How has the portfolio performed?


Let’s take a look at the You IndexTM representing my entire portfolio, provided by Personal Capital, which is plotted against the S&P 500 for 2016.

Hooray, I win! 11.52% up in 2016, compared to 9.54% for the S&P 500.

Not so fast.

Personal Capital likes to make you feel good about yourself by apparently reporting the S&P 500 returns without dividends reinvested. With dividends reinvested, the S&P 500 actually returned 11.96%. So we didn’t win, but came pretty darned close. Considering we were well diversified with a 10% bond allocation and 20% international, I’d say we did well to approach the returns of the S&P 500.

More recently, I’ve published quarterly updates. Here is a look at the first three quarters of 2017.

2017 Q1 PoF Portfolio Performance


I track all my investments with Personal Capital. If you choose to do the same, please sign up from a link on my site to further my charitable mission.

Like last year, we’re tracking pretty darned close to the S&P 500 so far this year. The S&P 500 has returned 5.21% and the PoF Portfolio is up 4.99%.



There was a decent gap there for awhile, but the gap has closed in the last 30 days, with the PoF Porftolio up 0.79% while the S&P 500 dropped 0.72%.



The top performer so far this year has been Emerging Markets, with VEMAX returning nearly 11% already in 2017.



Bonds have been rather flat, and have been the poorest performing class in the portfolio, eking out a miniscule gain year-to-date.


2017 Q2 PoF Portfolio Performance


The market hummed along in the second quarter. Volatility remained low, and gains were slow, but steady. The S&P 500 (Personal Capital’s standard benchmark) returned 2.57%, while my portfolio returned 2.78%.


2017 q2 MyIndex


Returns were boosted by the strong performance of international stocks. Developed markets outpaced emerging markets, making Vanguard’s Developed Markets Index my strongest performer at 6.38% for the quarter.


2017 q2 Developed Markets


My bond fund did what bond funds tend to do. While they typically underperform in good times, they also can be expected to outperform when stocks are down. As JL Collins says, they “smooth the ride.” In the second quarter, Vanguard’s Total Bond Fund gained 0.84%.


2017 q2 bonds

2017 Q3 PoF Portfolio Performance


At the risk of sounding like a broken record, we had another good quarter. According to Personal Capital’s You Index, my portfolio delivered returns of 4.17%, as compared to 3.96% for the S&P 500.

Impressive? Not so fast. My S&P 500 index fund outperformed both, with a quarterly return of 4.48%. That figure includes reinvested dividends, which are oddly excluded from many reports of the index returns, including the default view from Personal Capital. I’ll omit that orange line from the remaining figures after this one, using my You Index as the comparison.


my S&P 500 > your S&P 500?


My top holding from the last quarter happens to be my favorite (and only) individual stock, Berkshire Hathaway, with a return of 8.24% or nearly double that of the overall portfolio.



Another top performer of the third quarter was the emerging markets index fund, returning 7.77%. You tend to see more volatility with emerging markets, but good stretches can be really good.



The dud of the bunch, which should come as no surprise, is the total bond market fund. Most of the time, I’m glad I keep my bond allocation low at 10%. The smooth ride ended with a 0.09% quarterly return.



How did I come up with this allocation?


I read a couple books, spent some time exploring Bogleheads and WCI, and determined my risk tolerance. Vanguard has a simple risk tolerance questionnaire that takes a couple minutes to complete. Researching for this post, I played around with it a little bit and couldn’t actually come up with a 90 /10 stock bond recommendation. I’m not sure that outcome is even in the algorithm. I usually got 100% stock or 80 / 20 or 70 / 30 depending on when I said I would start taking the money from my investments.

The majority of my portfolio is invested in US stocks.  I like stocks for the returns, which have delivered an average of about 10% a year for a very long time. Small and value stocks are favored by people smarter than me for potentially higher returns, so I tilt a bit that way.

I have international stocks for diversification. I overweight emerging markets for the same reason I tilt to small value.  Experts with much more experience than me recommend anywhere from 0% to 50% or more of your stock portion be international.  I’ve gone with a nice round number in the middle.

REIT funds are considered part of the stock portion, but provide some additional diversity. High volatility has been rewarded with solid returns, particularly if you look back more than 10 years. That says nothing about the future, but real estate will always be required by businesses and people.

Bonds are there as a safe haven and diversifier. If we experience a downturn worse than the Great Depression, I should have something left. I doubt that will happen, but I feel better having a small bond allocation than none at all.


Let’s look under the hood.


Below you will see my asset allocation with the money I’ve got earmarked for retirement. Several items are not listed, including our:

One could argue for inclusion of the first two items as those have value and could be sold to fund retirement. I do include those when I calculate our net worth. I also include our 529 Plans in our net worth (it’s about 8%), but do not include it in our retirement portfolio, as it’s earmarked for a different purpose.

The DAF money, which would represent about another 8% of our portfolio, is no longer mine and will eventually be granted to charities of our choice. I don’t include that in our net worth or the retirement portfolio, but it will certainly serve a purpose in our retirement.



The taxable account has US stocks and International stocks. I tax loss harvest from this account, so the particular fund(s) used will vary as I exchange from one fund to a similar fund.

The Roth accounts have my small-cap and mid-cap value stocks, emerging markets, and REIT. The REIT fund is not very tax efficient, so this is a good place for it.

You might wonder how I have such a large percentage in the Roth IRA. Back in 2010, I converted pretty much all my retirement savings, which was in a SEP-IRA to Roth. In hindsight, it was probably not the smartest move, but the prevailing thought at the time was that the window to make a conversion would only be open to high earners for one year. The window never closed, and I paid 6 figures in extra income tax by making the conversion when I did. Live and learn.

I keep bonds in the 401(k). A total bond fund is not particularly tax efficient, so this is a good place for my bonds. After I retire, I anticipate rolling this over to a traditional IRA, and likely doing some Roth conversions. Whatever hasn’t been converted when I turn 70 will be subject to RMDs, so I also like bonds here for the likely lower long-term return.

The 457(b) has small-caps and mid-caps. Since I tax loss harvest in the taxable account, I avoid keeping identical funds here or anywhere else in the portfolio. Automatic investment and reinvestment of dividends could trigger a wash sale. The 457(b) fund will start paying out the year after I retire. I will eventually put some bonds in here since this will be part of the portfolio that I will be spending from in early retirement.

Nearly all funds are with Vanguard.  The portfolio consists entirely of mutual funds and a bit of cash.  I could also use ETFs, which are very similar to mutual funds, but trade a bit differently.  My mutual funds are passive, index funds.  There is no active management in these funds, and each passive fund tracks an established index.  This keeps fees low, and it’s not common for an actively traded fund to consistently outperform the index.


Why so aggressive?


I’ve chosen a rather aggressive allocation. Increasing risk increases potential reward. I know from experience (that ugly 2008) that I’ve got the mental fortitude to watch my accounts lose half their value and not sweat it. Those accounts have bounced back nicely and I was buying on the way down and on the recovery upswing.

My goal is to have > 36 years of anticipated expenses saved up before actually retiring; this is considerably more than the 25 years worth often cited as required to be FI (financially independent) and RE (retire early) and allows for a withdrawal rate of less than 3%. I like to call this financial freedom, which a level up from financial independence.

There seem to be two schools of thought as to how to invest an oversized nest egg. Some would say, “You’ve won the game. Why keep playing?” Put that money in a very safe portfolio and you’ll never run out. You could go with a conservative portfolio of 80% bonds / fixed income and coast.

I say phooey to that. My plan is to hold about 5 years worth of expenses in bonds. Assuming I still have my site, I can also count on an income stream from it, which is a nice bonus I didn’t necessarily anticipate when I first wrote this post.

With the remaining funds, I can be as aggressive as I wanna be. I’m not saying that I’m putting half my portfolio into Malaysian microcaps. I just don’t have a good enough reason to play it safe with this half of the portfolio. It’s a cushion that I would love to see grow, but if it dropped in half it wouldn’t phase me or affect my long-term plans whatsoever. It’s also money that I may not touch for a very long time, if ever, and if the market does tank, I’ll have time to allow it to recover while spending from the bond portion.

Does this plan expose me to unnecessary risk?  I suppose, although a diversified portfolio of index funds is light-years away from the riskiest way to invest a big pile of money. So why would I choose stocks over bonds for the overflow portion of my retirement portfolio? Because I can. Because I’m a man who like to compete and win. Like Ron Burgundy.


The Legendary Ron Burgundy


I’m willing to take the slight risk that my accounts could lose value and never recover in order to reap the benefits of the much more likely outcome of continued growth that outpaces both bond returns and inflation.

I’m not interested in working until I’ve amassed an 8-figure portfolio, but I’d be lying if I told you I don’t like the idea of maybe having one someday. If it happens, I’d prefer to let the portfolio do the heavy lifting for me.


You’re still not using Personal Capital? Track all your accounts in one place like I do.


Portfolio Performance Updates



What do you think of the PoF portfolio? Is it a PoS portfolio, or something you could live with as your own?  I’m open to advice and criticism and I would expect nothing less from my friends on the internet.  Sound off below!



  • TheGipper

    Love the post and your website PoF! I just bookmarked it and will surely return often.

    My AA is remarkably similar to yours, with some minor variation. Curious on how you settled on such a relatively large emerging market tilt on the international equity side of your portfolio. Good for you to stick with it over the last several years. Do you sometimes think that VEMAX is too heavily weighted towards China/Taiwan to be well diversified.

    I guess you’re not a subscriber to muni bonds in taxable over bonds in tax-deferred like I am. I guess when you only hold 10-15%), you’re overall REIT exposure is likely much higher than 10%, but I like that too.

    Most of my retirement savings is in tax-deferred 401k/PSP/DB plan. I was not as savvy or smart as you in 2010 and did not do any Roth conversions (for better or for worse). I now hope to play the Roth Conversion horesrace/ladder game from retirement date until age 70/SS/forced RMDs, if health, luck, and tax code co-operates! With any luck I can convert over several million at an effective tax rate at or below 20%. We shall see.

    • Thanks for the kind words, TheGipper!

      I’ve gone with a high EM allocation (10% overall) for the higher potential return. I’m not exactly risk averse. I have no idea if Chinese / Taiwanese stocks are weighted too heavily, but they have taken a beating lately. I’m a little over my target allocation because I tax loss harvested from Vanguard Developed Markets (0 EM) to FTSE All-World Ex-US, which has 14% EM.

      If I lived in a state that had a state specific Vanguard muni fund, I might have some in taxable. I’m not opposed to the idea of munis in taxable, and I’ve read WCI’s argument for bonds in taxable, but I’m not sure the math would work out in a higher interest rate environment. I can buy Vanguard Total Bond at an institutional expense ratio in my tax deferred, so there it goes.

      The Roth conversion ladder is a great way to fund an early retirement. I don’t think my mega Roth conversion was smart or savvy, but at least I did it when living in a lower tax state and before the additional ACA taxes took effect. I haven’t crunched the numbers, but it would make for an interesting post to analyze the repercussions of that decision. I’ll probably end up looking like a stupid dummy.

  • TheGipper

    Forgive the typo in the 2nd paragraph above, which should read:

    I guess you’re not a subscriber to muni bonds in taxable over bonds in tax-deferred. I guess when you only hold <10% in bonds, no big difference.

    I like you’re overall REIT exposure, but with all those Vanguard value funds (which are packed with REITs up to 15%), you're overall REIT exposure is higher than the target 10%, but I like that as well.

    • Typo forgiven. Thanks for the tip on the Value funds. I’ve read somewhere that TSM has about 4% REIT, but I hadn’t looked into the Value funds, which apparently have considerably more.

      I’ve considered reducing my REIT fund allocation and making a few investments via a real estate crowdfunding site. I would keep the real estate allocation to 10%. If I do this, I’ll be sure to write about the experience.

  • TheGipper

    I’ve been interested in looking into real estate crowdfunding as well but haven’t had the time. Would be interested in your thoughts if you do, particularly if it is a suitable candidate for a 1031 exchange with an existing investment rental condo.

  • Joe

    I like your portfolio. If you have the right fortitude, then it’s good for the long haul. I have about 20% in bonds right now. That’s my ammunition for when the market drops further. We don’t have as much income to invest now so I need more reserves. I assume you still have good income so 10% bond is plenty.
    I also like 50x expense. That’s a lot of padding, but I’m sure you’ll sleep better. Good luck on your journey.

    • Thanks, Joe! Love your blog, by the way. I’m still in the accumulation phase, able to claim FI, but not at all ready to retire. So, yeah… a low bond allocation and target for excess funds make sense for me right now. I could probably make the 25x I’ve got now work for the long haul, but I’ll gladly work another 5 or 6 years for a good chance of doubling it. I’m pretty happy with life as it is, although I feel strongly that I will enjoy freedom when I do pull the trigger someday and call it a career.

  • jk

    can you post your excel spreadsheet file that you use in this post so that I can import my own information to figure out my allocation in each account. It looks awesome!

    • That’s a good idea, jk.

      If it were that simple, I could, but mine is custom made to reflect the number of funds I have in each account, and the actual spreadsheets has dollar amounts which I’ve obviously left out. I can think about creating a template and posting it along with the calculators. When I find time, I will see what I can do. Check back!

  • Good allocation! Bond yields are so low now. In the accumulation phase one should take lots of equity risk and use market corrections to scoop up more equities on the cheap.
    And in this day and age with low bond yields, it’s probably even wise for retirees to be (almost) all equities. I don’t see how you get close to 4% real return with a sizable bond allocation.

  • Wow, I can tell that you really did your homework. Our current asset allocation is pretty similar to yours (we don’t have it posted yet). We’re looking to build up our REITs to account for 10% of our portfolio. It’s going to take a while to build it up to that percentage since we’re putting it into our Roths and it’s only 5% now. Our bonds make up about 12% of the portfolio: 10% for U.S. Bonds and 2% for International Bonds. International stocks make up about 23% and the rest is in U.S stocks. We picked an asset allocation that works for us and are planning to stick to it. After we have 25 years worth of expenses in the portfolio we plan to continue investing any new money into physical real estate and diversify further.

  • JP


    I would love to get your feedback on my portfolio and the location of the assets

    so far i have been using the fidelity freedom funds 2045 fund (FFKGX) (ER 0.64) in my 401k and 457 at fidelity.
    I also have roth IRA account for myself and my wife, plus a taxable account at Vanguard. I use the Vanguard personal advisory service for the vanguard accounts (they charge 0.3%). Unfortunately they dont help much with the non-vanguard accounts.

    I want to take the money out of the Fidelity freedom funds and use the low cost Vanguard funds in the 401k and 457

    Age: 40
    Desired Asset allocation: 75% stocks / 25% bonds
    Desired International allocation: 33% of total stocks

    I would like the following allocation

    REIT Vanguard REIT index fund 10%

    Remaining 65% of stocks are divided as follows

    US stocks 43% of total portfolio
    33% Vanguard total stock market index fund
    10% iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value Idx (ETF)

    22% international stocks will be invested in Vanguard Total international stock market index fund

    For 25% Bonds I would like to divide it between an index bond fund and TIPS.

    12.5% Vanguard total Bond market index fund (available in 401k) or some other bond fund (I am open to suggestions)
    12.5% in TIPS

    Now regarding the location of the different funds in different accounts, here is what I am thinking

    REIT index fund goes in the ROTH IRAs

    Extra REIT amount which did not fit into ROTH IRA goes into 401K ( I can use fidelity brokerage link to access fidelity REIT index fund)

    401 K and 457 will also hold the following funds
    – iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value Idx (ETF)
    – Vanguard total Bond market index fund (available in 401k)
    – TIPS (suggestions welcome for a fidelity fund)

    Taxable Account
    -Vanguard Total Stock Market index fund
    -Vanguard Total International stock market index Fund

    I would really appreciate any feedback . I am open to suggestions if you think there is a better way to locate these funds or if there any suggestions to improve the portfolio.

    Additional layer of complexity is added by the fact that my 401k/457 has vanguard s & p 500 index fund, vanguard extended market index fund and vanguard total bond market index fund but does not have any of the other vanguard funds mentioned above. However I can use any fidelity funds through brokerage link for no additional fees. Unfortunately for using vanguard funds through the brokerage link I will have to pay additional transaction fees which I would like to avoid

    Thanks a lot

  • I like how you avoid having any total stock market or total international outside of the taxable portion to allow for tax loss harvesting. Thanks for the tip!

    • You bet! I’ve found it’s the easiest way to avoid wash sales. Fortunately, it’s easy to swap out of funds in the tax advantaged accounts if you are currently set up in a way that you could have an issue.


  • ken

    90% equities being retired at an early age is far too risky for my stomach lining

  • Joe

    It’s interesting reading the various portfolios of bloggers! I’m shooting for something simpler…25% us stocks, 25% Reit, 25% corporate bonds, 25% gold

  • Pingback: Top 5 Ways to Manage Your Money - Physician on FIRE

  • Pingback: Selling Shares Beats Collecting Dividends - Physician on FIRE

  • Pingback: The Sunday Best (11/19/2017) - Physician on FIRE

  • Pingback: The Sunday Best (11/19/2017) - FIRE Wanderer

  • Pingback: Vanguard Backdoor Roth: a Step by Step Guide - Physician on FIRE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *